Best Roulette Strategy Forum

4/8/2022by admin
Best Roulette Strategy Forum Rating: 9,0/10 6506 reviews

Firstly, roulette doesn’t work that way – the odds of success are at best 35:1. Secondly, some strategy guides are ideal for playing American roulette online, with others best suited to European online roulette. The trick is finding which strategy suits your needs best when you play roulette online for money. The 'Best' Betting Systems for Roulette. When planning out your strategy for roulette, you may find it useful to have a look at some of the more popular systems for reference. Each has its own strengths and weaknesses and can be adapted to your goals. With luck and skillful application, any of these systems may turn a profit. Roulette systems & strategies, visual ballistics, bias analysis, roulette computers & more. Best Roulette Strategy – Roulette Betting Systems Explained Being one of the most famous casino games of all time, roulette has been subject to a lot of analysis and odd calculations. The game looks simple enough and has the potential of winning you lots of money with just a single spin of the wheel.

The Martingale Strategy is one of the most famous and popular strategies, thanks to the very simple and easy way to use it. This means to bet on simple chances only (eg red/ black) and start with a relatively small bet amount. If you lose a bet, then you double your stake in the next game. As soon as you win, you will have regained all your previous losses, in addition, you will make a small profit, equal to the size of the initial bet. As you are betting on simple odds, you have almost 50:50 odds of winning, so it seems easy to win on just a few games. You should preferably play European or French roulette with the La Partage rule, in order to keep the casino advantage as low as possible.

If you try to play with this system, you will quickly realize that it is not uncommon to lose, regardless of the 50:50 odds. In this case, the size of your bets increases rapidly, and very soon, you will have either exhausted your bankroll or exceeded the maximum limit bet for the table. In fact, you can exceed the bet limit quickly. When this happens, the Martingale system can no longer be used, and the player goes away with significant losses. It is for this reason that many players who want to use this system are looking for roulette games with no table limit. This allows them to continue to double their bet a lot more times in the event of a series of losses.

Another disadvantage of using this system is the relatively small benefits that can be achieved. As you can see on this table, no matter how many times you double your bet, when you win, your profit will be just the size of your initial bet. As a result, you can risk huge amounts of money, but you will only get a small profit.

To avoid losing, some players will not bet on a game until a series of the same color numbers has occurred. The logic here is that when 5 reds have won, the law of probability says that blacks are more likely to win then. So, at this point, they start betting. However, this practice is based on several false assumptions. For one of them, long streaks of the same color are unlikely. You will, therefore, lose a lot of time waiting for a pattern to occur. Moreover, even when a series of a result has occurred, it does not mean that the following games will produce the opposite results. At the end of the day, the use of this system has exactly the same hope of winning. The only difference is that it will be a lot more boring because of the long periods of waiting and watching, rather than playing.

Thread Rating:

ademco
I don't care who knows about it and I'm not trying to sell it. I know some of the members on this site have coding expeariance as does the site owner and I just want someone to proove me wrong, if I am!
in a nutshell. On a normal roulette table there are several ways to bet, some of the odds are seemingly good (17-1 53-1) but I prefer the 2-1 bets, these are streets and the 12s. On a street (I believe im using this term right, I mean the pay lines at the back of the table as in the line 1 4 7 10 13 16 19 22 25 28 31 34) on each line you have a little less than 1/3 chance of winning. I believe I saw on one site a stat of 31.8%. The few times I have been to casinos with real roulette, I play two of them usually the outside two. If the ball lands on any one number on those two lines you win 2-1 which means you loose one bet and tripple the other giving you a gain of 1 betting unit per bet. If the stat I saw was right 31.8% this should mean that the odds if you pick two of them is 63.16%
You may loose several bets in a row to a ball landing on the one line you diddnt play or on 0 or 00 but overall this system statistically should win. Unless Im wrong.
If I am wrong please explain to me how using math, or a code test, I would appreciate the help in the event I am wrong but according to the math I dont think I am
RonC
Assuming your numbers are correct, let's take $2,000 to the casino and bet it $20 ($10 on two groups of 12) at a time for 100 bets...
We'll do them right in a row...63 wins followed by 37 losses...
Win 1 unit 63 of the time @ $20 a bet =Bet $1260 and return of $1890 with $740 remaining to bet from the original amount...now you have $2630
Lose 2 units 37 of the time @ $20 a bet = Lose $740...now you have $1890.
Even simplified like this, the house advantage is almost correct (within $5, based on the rounding)
This is a loser...can it win sometimes? Sure. It is still a loser...
heather
This is how James Bond played Roulette in the book (not movie) 'Casino Royale', so you're not the first to think of it. I've tried it a few times and it seemed boring and didn't make me any significant money.
I don't have anything that runs long-term projections for Roulette or I'd do those for you. I am guessing that it ends up being very close to the HE, though. If this system worked consistently, Roulette would have been modified to reduce its effectiveness by now.
RonC

This is how James Bond played Roulette in the book (not movie) 'Casino Royale', so you're not the first to think of it. I've tried it a few times and it seemed boring and didn't make me any significant money.
I don't have anything that runs long-term projections for Roulette or I'd do those for you. I am guessing that it ends up being very close to the HE, though. If this system worked consistently, Roulette would have been modified to reduce its effectiveness by now.


I played this way for several days in Las Vegas on one of our earlier trips. I would bet $25-$100 on two of the groups of 12. I lost a lot of money and had a host want to meet me. Unless you are a really high-level player at a low house edge game, meeting a host is not a good sign!!!
WASHOO2
Ignore the layout of the felt. Go by sections of the 0/00 wheel and then target those sections of 12 contiguous numbers on each side of the wheel.
Sometimes you will be betting the first and second dozen , the second and the third dozen , or the third and the first dozen.
Once you have mastered this you can go further and eliminate 2 numbers from the 24 pockets and operate on a reduced scale. It`s nly one number on each half of the wheel.
Just keep following the action of the wheel.
WASHOO2
MangoJ
Come on guys. the dozen bet pays 2:1, while the probability of a hit is 12/37 = 32.4%. This should not be too complicated, the dozen bet is negative EV (3*12/37 - 1 = -2.7%).
Playing two dozen bets does not change this very EV. If you play two dozen bets, the odds are 1:2, the probability of a hit is 24/37.
The EV of the combined bet is . Surprised ?
The two-dozen bet is as good (or as bad) as any other bet you make. The only thing it chances is variance. But if you want low variance, why don't you play the triple dozen bet ?
MakingBook

Best Roulette Strategy Forum Games

I have an online casino that I offer to all my players.
I would be thrilled if they would use the system.
'I am a man devoured by the passion for gambling.' --Dostoevsky, 1871
ahiromu
First time I was in Vegas, I'd play two 12-sets at a time for $25 each and leave when I made $50. It went very well.

Best Roulette Strategy Forum Sites

Last night, I bought in for $20 and put $3 down on 6 numbers and $2 elsewhere. It hit 00. Fuck roulette.
Its - Possessive; It's - 'It is' / 'It has'; There - Location; Their - Possessive; They're - 'They are'
Wizard
Administrator
I wonder which is more:
A. Number of players to believe they have a long-term winning betting system.Best roulette strategy forum sites
StrategyB. Number of players to believe they could invent a casino game equal or better to what is out there now.
C. Number of players to believe both A and B.

Best Roulette Strategy Forum Yahoo


D. Number of times somebody has remarked 'The hard part is keeping the weight off' in the HB challenge thread.
It's not whether you win or lose; it's whether or not you had a good bet.
Best roulette strategy forum yahoo
CrapsForever
My wife (Who hates gambling) has played Roulette 7 total times and won 5 times with the same number in 3 different countries: The #17
What are the odds of that???
Last victory was last Saturday. Next time, I'm in a Casino with her; I'm putting $100 straight-up on the #17.

Best Roulette Strategy Forum Game

Craps is the most 'Jekyll and Hyde' casino game ever invented!
Comments are closed.